Below is a list of Distributors / Retailers who are selling the ZeroUAV YS-X6 around the world.
I am offering this service because I get many enquiries from around the world and sometimes it is not financially viable for me to sell to customers from other countries.
Australia – Multirotortech
France – Maxicopter
South Africa – Multirotor
Spain – RC Innovations
UK – Electriflite
USA – GotheliRC
ArduIMU based Quad Rotor Copter with an on board surveillance camera.It has an on chip accelerometer and a gyro on the IMU and an additional magnetometer for stabilization.
Friday, 21 December 2012
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
Monday, 17 December 2012
Friday, 14 December 2012
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
COMPANYS TO BUY YOUR GEAR
Manufacturer | Parent Company | Support Hotline | Replacement Parts Lists | Warranty | Return Policy | Website |
E-flite RC | subsidiary of Horizon Hobby | yes [1] | yes [2] | 1 year [3] | no direct sales | |
Fly Zone | subsidiary of Hobbico | yes [4] | yes [5] | "guarantees products to be free from defects in material and workmanship at the date of purchase" [6] | no direct sales | |
Hangar 9 | subsidiary of Horizon Hobby | yes [7] | yes [8] | unclear from website | no direct sales | |
HobbyZone | subsidiary of Horizon Hobby | yes, with call-back [9] | yes [10] | "guarantees products to be free from defects in material and workmanship at the date of purchase" [11] | 30 days, minus shipping costs; electronics may not have seal broken [12] | |
ParkFlyers R/C | yes [13] | yes [14] | unknown | 9 days, minus 15% restocking fee and shipping costs [15] | ||
Park Hobbies | Privately owned [16] | yes, with call-back [17] | yes | "Parkhobbies.com guarantees our kits to be free from defects in material and workmanship at the time of purchase."[18] | 10 days from receipt of purchase[19] | |
Stevens AreoModel | Privately Owned | Yes, telephone and email | Yes | Yes [20] | Yes [20] | http://www.stevensaero.com/ |
Aero Works | Privately Owned | Yes, telephone and email[21] and forums [22] | Not Found on Website | Yes, 30 days. | Yes, 15% Restocking Fee [23] | http://aero-works.net |
Hobbico | Privately (Employee) Owned | Yes, telephone and email[24] | Yes | Yes, depends on sub-brand. | Yes, within 30 days. | http://www.hobbico.com |
[edit] See also
D.I.Y
DIY Cruise Missile
Simpson garnered significant media attention in 2003 when he announced his intention to build a DIY cruise missile for US$5000 using only "off-the-shelf" technology, mostly purchased from eBay and other online stores. The purpose of the project was to prove the point he made in an article published on 20 May 2002 that a cruise missile can be built with off the shelf technology and knowledge available to the general public. Simpson states on his FAQ page that he is not developing a new technology or creating a new threat, but creating awareness of an existing threat with the hope that it will stimulate research into an effective defense.
The project was put on hold when Simpson was adjudged bankrupt after a prosecution by the New Zealand Inland Revenue Department. Simpson claimed that the prosecution was politically motivated, as it was the only legal strategy available to the government of New Zealand to stop his work. A documentary which aired in April 2004 explored the events surrounding his prosecution.Simpson resumed and completed construction of the prototype cruise missile. His website claims that the missile is in "safe hands" somewhere in New Zealand, in a location unknown to him. Simpson says that not knowing the missile's whereabouts is a legal strategy intended to prevent his prosecution while it is tested. Simpson also claims to be halfway finished with completing a second cruise missile which he intends to donate to a museum or educational institution.[13] He stated an intention to release a book about his experience with the development of the missile, the media interest in 2003, and the reaction of the United States and New Zealand Governments to his announcement
Simpson garnered significant media attention in 2003 when he announced his intention to build a DIY cruise missile for US$5000 using only "off-the-shelf" technology, mostly purchased from eBay and other online stores. The purpose of the project was to prove the point he made in an article published on 20 May 2002 that a cruise missile can be built with off the shelf technology and knowledge available to the general public. Simpson states on his FAQ page that he is not developing a new technology or creating a new threat, but creating awareness of an existing threat with the hope that it will stimulate research into an effective defense.
The project was put on hold when Simpson was adjudged bankrupt after a prosecution by the New Zealand Inland Revenue Department. Simpson claimed that the prosecution was politically motivated, as it was the only legal strategy available to the government of New Zealand to stop his work. A documentary which aired in April 2004 explored the events surrounding his prosecution.Simpson resumed and completed construction of the prototype cruise missile. His website claims that the missile is in "safe hands" somewhere in New Zealand, in a location unknown to him. Simpson says that not knowing the missile's whereabouts is a legal strategy intended to prevent his prosecution while it is tested. Simpson also claims to be halfway finished with completing a second cruise missile which he intends to donate to a museum or educational institution.[13] He stated an intention to release a book about his experience with the development of the missile, the media interest in 2003, and the reaction of the United States and New Zealand Governments to his announcement
fpv (first-person view
Video piloting
First-person view (FPV) flight is a type of remote-control flying that has grown in popularity in recent years. It involves mounting a small video camera and television transmitter on an RC aircraft and flying by means of a live video down-link, commonly displayed on video goggles or a portable LCD screen. When flying FPV, the pilot sees from the aircraft's perspective, and does not even have to look at the model. As a result, FPV aircraft can be flown well beyond visual range, limited only by the range of the remote control and video transmitter. Video transmitters typically operate at a power level between 200 mW and 1500 mW. The most common frequencies used for video transmission are 900 MHz, 1.2 GHz, 2.4 GHz, and 5.8 GHz. Specialized long-range UHF control systems operating at 433 MHz (for amateur radio licensees only) or 869 MHZ are commonly used to achieve greater control range, while the use of directional, high-gain antennas increases video range. Sophisticated setups are capable of achieving a range of 20–30 miles or more.
A basic FPV system consists of a camera, video transmitter, video receiver, and a display. More advanced setups commonly add in specialized hardware, including on-screen displays with GPS navigation and flight data, stabilization systems, and autopilot devices with "return to home" capability—allowing the aircraft to fly back to its starting point on its own in the event of signal loss. On-board cameras can be equipped with a pan and tilt mount, which when coupled with video goggles and "head tracking" devices creates a truly immersive, first-person experience, as if the pilot was actually sitting in the cockpit of the RC aircraft.
Both helicopters and fixed-wing RC aircraft are used for FPV flight. The most commonly chosen airframes for FPV planes are larger models with sufficient payload space for the video equipment and large wings capable of supporting the extra weight. Pusher-propeller planes are preferred so that the propeller is not in view of the camera. "Flying wing" designs are also popular for FPV, as they provide the best combination of large wing surface area, speed, maneuverability, and gliding ability. FPV aircraft are frequently used for aerial photography and videography, and many videos of FPV flights can be found on popular video sites such as YouTube and Vimeo.
In the United States, the Academy of Model Aeronautics' own safety code forbids the pilot of the model from observing its flight solely with onboard video, requiring the modeler to strictly use their own natural vision, only augmented by corrective eyewear when prescribed, throughout the flight to observe and safely control the model
First-person view (FPV) flight is a type of remote-control flying that has grown in popularity in recent years. It involves mounting a small video camera and television transmitter on an RC aircraft and flying by means of a live video down-link, commonly displayed on video goggles or a portable LCD screen. When flying FPV, the pilot sees from the aircraft's perspective, and does not even have to look at the model. As a result, FPV aircraft can be flown well beyond visual range, limited only by the range of the remote control and video transmitter. Video transmitters typically operate at a power level between 200 mW and 1500 mW. The most common frequencies used for video transmission are 900 MHz, 1.2 GHz, 2.4 GHz, and 5.8 GHz. Specialized long-range UHF control systems operating at 433 MHz (for amateur radio licensees only) or 869 MHZ are commonly used to achieve greater control range, while the use of directional, high-gain antennas increases video range. Sophisticated setups are capable of achieving a range of 20–30 miles or more.
A basic FPV system consists of a camera, video transmitter, video receiver, and a display. More advanced setups commonly add in specialized hardware, including on-screen displays with GPS navigation and flight data, stabilization systems, and autopilot devices with "return to home" capability—allowing the aircraft to fly back to its starting point on its own in the event of signal loss. On-board cameras can be equipped with a pan and tilt mount, which when coupled with video goggles and "head tracking" devices creates a truly immersive, first-person experience, as if the pilot was actually sitting in the cockpit of the RC aircraft.
Both helicopters and fixed-wing RC aircraft are used for FPV flight. The most commonly chosen airframes for FPV planes are larger models with sufficient payload space for the video equipment and large wings capable of supporting the extra weight. Pusher-propeller planes are preferred so that the propeller is not in view of the camera. "Flying wing" designs are also popular for FPV, as they provide the best combination of large wing surface area, speed, maneuverability, and gliding ability. FPV aircraft are frequently used for aerial photography and videography, and many videos of FPV flights can be found on popular video sites such as YouTube and Vimeo.
In the United States, the Academy of Model Aeronautics' own safety code forbids the pilot of the model from observing its flight solely with onboard video, requiring the modeler to strictly use their own natural vision, only augmented by corrective eyewear when prescribed, throughout the flight to observe and safely control the model
Tuesday, 11 December 2012
Monday, 10 December 2012
$50,000
Search and Rescue Challenge
This category is open to Australian and international university students and aerospace enthusiasts.
The Mission
Outback Joe is lost in the Australian outback and desperately needs assistance. You must develop a UAV that is capable of locating Outback Joe and delivering an emergency package to him.
Where’s Outback Joe?
Your system must be capable of searching an area of at least 2nm x 2nm, up to 5nm from the aerodrome. The target for your search will be a dummy positioned in a typical resting pose in a rural setting.
The GPS coordinates of the search area are provided in Search and rescue Challenge Rules. The air vehicle must not travel outside of the search area or transit lane, for its flight will be terminated if it does so. The search area will be not more that 5nm from the aerodrome.
Over a 60 minute period teams launch their aircraft, conduct their search and locate Outback Joe. Once he has been found a GPS coordinate representing Outback Joe's location must be provided to the judges.
Rescue Outback Joe!
If GPS location for Outback Joe provided to the judges by the team is within 100 metres of Joe’s location the team will be given approval to deliver the emergency package. The emergency package will contain 500ml of 'life saving' water. The package must be dropped as closely as possible to Outback Joe, without landing on him. The UAV will then return to the Kingaroy airport for recovery.
The minimum requirements for the air vehicle are as follows:
The air vehicle must not weigh more than 100 kg (rotary) or 150kg (fixed wing) in the competition configuration
Points will be awarded based on the mission performance including the accuracy of the emergency package delivery, and the team’s answers to questions from the judges prior to the mission.
Additional Deliverables
Entrants will be required to submit a technical report before the close of registration. Later a more detailed technical report which outlines their design, methodology for package deployment and operational and safety procedures along with a flight demonstration video must be submitted and will contribute to the team’s score. Finally an Autonomous Flight Record that documents a minimum of five hours of autonomous flight must be provided.
Rules
Before entering, make sure you have read the UAV Challenge - Outback Rescue Competition Rules (V. 1.4, PDF, 5.44 MB) for the Search and Rescue Challenge.
Deliverable 2 Compliance Statement
UAVChallengeComplianceStatement2012-1.pdf
Waypoint Files
Search & Rescue Challenge Layout
2010OpenS&RLayout.kmz
Search & Rescue Scrutineering
2010S&RScrintineeringCourse.kmz
The prize
Winners in this category will receive AU$50,000*
The Schedule
For full schedule details please refer to the Search and Rescue Challenge 2011/12 rules. The key dates are:
Registration
closes on 27 July 2011 at 5pm AEST
Deliverable 1: Flight Safety Review
At the latest: 27 July 2011 at 5pm AEST
Deliverable 2: Flight Readiness Review
At the latest: 18 April 2012 at 5pm AEST
Deliverable 3: Autonomous Flight Record
At the latest: 15 Aug 2012 at 5pm AEST
Final “Go/No-Go” Announcement of Teams
22 Aug 2012
Search and Rescue Challenge
1 – 4 Oct 2012
Location
The Search and Rescue Challenge 2011/12 will be held in Kingaroy in October 2012
This category is open to Australian and international university students and aerospace enthusiasts.
The Mission
Outback Joe is lost in the Australian outback and desperately needs assistance. You must develop a UAV that is capable of locating Outback Joe and delivering an emergency package to him.
Where’s Outback Joe?
Your system must be capable of searching an area of at least 2nm x 2nm, up to 5nm from the aerodrome. The target for your search will be a dummy positioned in a typical resting pose in a rural setting.
The GPS coordinates of the search area are provided in Search and rescue Challenge Rules. The air vehicle must not travel outside of the search area or transit lane, for its flight will be terminated if it does so. The search area will be not more that 5nm from the aerodrome.
Over a 60 minute period teams launch their aircraft, conduct their search and locate Outback Joe. Once he has been found a GPS coordinate representing Outback Joe's location must be provided to the judges.
Rescue Outback Joe!
If GPS location for Outback Joe provided to the judges by the team is within 100 metres of Joe’s location the team will be given approval to deliver the emergency package. The emergency package will contain 500ml of 'life saving' water. The package must be dropped as closely as possible to Outback Joe, without landing on him. The UAV will then return to the Kingaroy airport for recovery.
The minimum requirements for the air vehicle are as follows:
The air vehicle must not weigh more than 100 kg (rotary) or 150kg (fixed wing) in the competition configuration
Points will be awarded based on the mission performance including the accuracy of the emergency package delivery, and the team’s answers to questions from the judges prior to the mission.
Additional Deliverables
Entrants will be required to submit a technical report before the close of registration. Later a more detailed technical report which outlines their design, methodology for package deployment and operational and safety procedures along with a flight demonstration video must be submitted and will contribute to the team’s score. Finally an Autonomous Flight Record that documents a minimum of five hours of autonomous flight must be provided.
Rules
Before entering, make sure you have read the UAV Challenge - Outback Rescue Competition Rules (V. 1.4, PDF, 5.44 MB) for the Search and Rescue Challenge.
Deliverable 2 Compliance Statement
UAVChallengeComplianceStatement2012-1.pdf
Waypoint Files
Search & Rescue Challenge Layout
2010OpenS&RLayout.kmz
Search & Rescue Scrutineering
2010S&RScrintineeringCourse.kmz
The prize
Winners in this category will receive AU$50,000*
The Schedule
For full schedule details please refer to the Search and Rescue Challenge 2011/12 rules. The key dates are:
Registration
closes on 27 July 2011 at 5pm AEST
Deliverable 1: Flight Safety Review
At the latest: 27 July 2011 at 5pm AEST
Deliverable 2: Flight Readiness Review
At the latest: 18 April 2012 at 5pm AEST
Deliverable 3: Autonomous Flight Record
At the latest: 15 Aug 2012 at 5pm AEST
Final “Go/No-Go” Announcement of Teams
22 Aug 2012
Search and Rescue Challenge
1 – 4 Oct 2012
Location
The Search and Rescue Challenge 2011/12 will be held in Kingaroy in October 2012
Design Process
Design Process
The design process
for the quadcopter is best described by first explaining the
mechanical design and then following up with the electrical design. The following subsections will describe in
detail the steps taken to design the quadcopter.
The
unique nature of a flying machine requires a frame design that is both strong
and lightweight. However, most materials that exhibit both of these
characteristics are expensive, and also difficult to process. Therefore,
aluminum was selected as the primary frame material due to its ready availability,
relatively low cost, and reasonable strength to weight properties. Any
components that were not major structural members were designed to be plastic,
which is generally more expensive but lighter.
The
original frame design involved mounting all four engines near the center of the
flying machine, and extending driveshafts out to the four rotors. This design
had the disadvantage of being very heavy (close to 15 lbs), and the
drivetrain design was complex and difficult to build. The basic quadcopter
design requires two of the four rotors to spin in the opposite direction as the
other two. In the first generation frame design, this was accomplished through
gearing, adding to the complexity of the design. The main reason for mounting
the engines near the center was a perceived increase in stability due to most
of the mass of the machine being located near the center of mass, decreasing
the potential moment on the machine.
A complex
electrical system had to be designed in order to gather and process information
in order to control the quadcopter. A top-level block diagram containing all of
the major components of the electrical system is shown in Figure.
The main part of the entire electrical system is the Controller board (which in our case was the Ardu-IMU V2 board). Controller board accepts input from various other electrical devices (Sensors) which it processes and provides output to the motors, for controlling the quadcopter.
Sunday, 9 December 2012
australian N.S.W flying clubs
Archville Eagles
Website: n/a
Location: Yellow Rock Road, Urunga.
Contact: Paul Hinton .0266582878 / pauljudy[at]dodo[dot]com[dot]au.
Bathurst Model Aero SportsWebsite: n/a
Location: Yellow Rock Road, Urunga.
Contact: Paul Hinton .0266582878 / pauljudy[at]dodo[dot]com[dot]au.
Website: www.bathurstmodelaerosports.com.au
Location: Bathurst.
Bega District Model Club
Website: n/a
Location: Princes Highway, Frogs Hollow, South Bega.
Contact: Gary Hooper - turabeach[at]iprimus[dot]com[dot]au.
Central Coast Model Aero Club
Website: www.centralcoastmodelaeroclub.com
Location: Mannering Park, north of Sydney - see website for map.
Forster Great Lakes Model Aero Club
Website: www.fglmac.org
Location: Situated eight minutes south of Forster on the Lakes Way.
Gosford City Aeromodellers Club
Website: www.gcac.org.au
Location: Mangrove Rd, Narara.
Lake Macqaurie Miniature Aircraft Club (LMMAC)
Website: www.lmmac.net
Location: Griffen Road, Teralba, Lake Macqaurie.
Mathoura Radio Control Model Aircraft Club
Website: n/a
Location: Tantanane Rd Mathoura.
Contact: Douglas Henwood - 0457805068 / doughenwood @ bigpond . com
Milton/Ulladulla Model Aircraft Club
Website: n/a
Location: Ulladulla Sports Park (Follow the signs to the Sports Park and Skate Park), Ulladulla
Contact: Richard Knox (Club President) on 02 4457 3120 / rpknox[at]bigpond[dot]com.
New South Wales Scale Aircraft Society
Website: n/a
Location: Sydney, NSW
Contact: 02-97346288.
Northern Beaches Soaring Club
Website: n/a
Location: Various, on the Northern Beaches.
Contact: Patrick McGrath: mcgrathpatrick[at]hotmail[dot]com/(02) 9979 5638.
Parramatta Radio Control Aircraft Club
Website: www.rcflyingclub.com
Location: Reynolds Park off Tucks Rd & Powers Rd, Toongabbie.
Orange Model Aircraft Club Inc.
Website: n/a
Location: 16 Klms west of Orange on The Escort Way towards Parkes & Forbes
Contact: E-mail Norman Barnes at norbar[at]bigpond[dot]com.
Penrith Glenmore Park RC Flying Club
Website: n/a
Location: Glenmore Park 2745, Sydney West
Contact: Nasir Subhan: 0411134022 / subhan.nasir[at]gmail[dot]com.
Rebel Flying Club
Website: www.rebelflyingclub.com/
Location: Hexham, Newcastle.
Sunset Soaring Club, Inc.
Website: www.sunsetsoaring.org
Location: Golden Jubilee Back Oval, Esk St. Wahroonga.
Sutherland Shire Sport Flying Association Inc.
Website: n/a
Location: 300m south of the turnoff to WQoronora Dam on Old Princes Highway, Sydney.
Contact: Bryan.
The New South Wales Scale Aircraft Society Inc.
Website: www.nswsas.com.au
Location: We do not have a flying field of our own, but instead utilise other club fields promoting Scale Aircraft modelling through our Club Scale competitions. Sydney.
Warringah Radio Control Society
Website: www.wrcs.org.au/
Location: Belrose on Sydney's North Shore
Saturday, 8 December 2012
common abbreviations
Abbreviation | Interpretation |
ACC | Accelerometer |
ACCU | German (among other languages) for rechargeable Battery |
APP | Anderson Power Poles |
ARM | Advanced RISC Machine, now the proper name for ARM Ltd. |
ATV | Adjustable Travel Volume |
BEC or BESC | Battery Eliminator Circuit |
BOM | Bill Of Materials |
CC | CopterControl |
CC3D | Copter Control 3D |
CG or COG | Center Of Gravity |
CPU | Central Processing Unit (ST ARM SOCs on OP boards) |
CRC | Cyclic redundancy check |
ESC | Electronic Speed Controller |
EPA | End Point Adjustment |
FC | Flight Controller |
FPV | First Person View |
GCS | Ground Control Station |
GND | Ground (mostly referring to the minus of the battery) |
HK | Hobbyking |
HPF | High-pass Filter |
I2C | Inter Integrated Circuit, (A communication bus) |
IMU | Inertial Measurement Unit |
INS | Inertial Navigation System |
JST-SH | A type of Connectors |
JTAG | Joint Test Action Group |
KK | Kaptein Kuk (Multicopter controller by Rolf Bakke) |
LiPo | Lithium-Polymer-Akkumulator (Battery) |
LOS | Line Of Sight, also can mean Loss Of Signal |
LPF | Low-pass Filter |
MEMS | Micro Electro Mechanical System |
MK | Mikrokopter |
MWC | MultiWii Copter |
Nick | German for fore/aft pitch or elevator |
OP | OpenPilot |
OSD | On-screen Display |
PCB | Printed Circuit Board |
PCM | Pulse-code Modulation |
PID | Proportional-Integral-Derivative |
PFD | Primary Flight Display |
PPM | Pulse Position Modulation |
PWM | Pulse Width Modulation |
PWR | Power (often referring to the plus of the battery) |
RC | Remote Controlled |
RCG | RCGroups |
RX | Receiver |
SCCP | Source Code Control Program (OP uses Git for this) |
SCL | Serial Clock Line (I2C bus) |
SDA | Serial Data Line (I2C bus) |
SOC | System On a Chip |
SVN | A revision/version control system |
Sx | Servo |
TX | Transmitter |
UART | Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter |
UAV | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
UAV-Talk | An open binary protocol |
USART | Universal Synchronous-Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter |
VCP | Virtual Communication Port |
VTOL | Vertical Take Off & Landing |
WMP | Wii Motion Plus |
XT60 | A type of connector |
mirco air vehicle
In January 2010, the Tamkang University (TKU) in Taiwan realized autonomous control of the flight altitude of an 8-gram, 20-centimeter wide, flapping-wing MAV. The MEMS Lab in the TKU has been developing MAVs for several years, and since 2007 the Space and Flight Dynamics (SFD) Lab has joined the research team for the development of autonomous flight of MAVs. Instead of traditional sensors and computational devices, which are too heavy for most MAVs, the SFD combined a stereo-vision system with a ground station to control the flight altitude, making it the first flapping-wing MAV under 10 grams that realized autonomous flight.
In 2008, the TU Delft University in the Netherlands developed the smallest ornithopter fitted with a camera, the Delfly Micro, the third version of the Delfly project that started in 2005. This version measures 10 centimeters and weighs 3 grams, slightly larger (and noisier) than the dragonfly on which it was modeled. The importance of the camera lies in remote control when the Delfly is out of sight. However, this version has not yet been successfully tested outside, although it performs well indoors. Researcher David Lentink of Wageningen University, who participated in the development of previous models, DelFly I and DelFly II, says it will take at least half a century to mimic the capabilities of insects, with their low energy consumption and multitude of sensors—not only eyes, but gyroscopes, wind sensors, and much more. He says fly-size ornithopters should be possible, provided the tail is well designed. Rick Ruijsink of TU Delft cites battery weight as the biggest problem; the lithium-ion battery in the Delfly micro, at one gram, constitutes a third of the weight. Luckily, developments in this area are still going very fast, due to demand in various other commercial fields.
Ruijsink says the purpose of these craft is to understand insect flight and to provide practical uses, such as flying through cracks in concrete to search for earthquake victims or exploring radioactivity-contaminated buildings. Spy agencies and the military also see potential for such small vehicles as spies and scouts.
Robert Wood at Harvard University developed an even smaller ornithopter, at just 3 centimeters, but this craft is not autonomous in that it gets its power through a wire and is led along a rail.
In early 2008 the United States company Honeywell received FAA approval to operate its MAV, designated as gMAV in the national airspace on an experimental basis. The gMAV is the fourth MAV to receive such approval. The Honeywell gMAV uses ducted thrust for lift, allowing it to takeoff and land vertically and to hover. It is also capable of "high-speed" forward flight, according to the company, but no performance figures have been released. The company also states that the machine is light enough to be carried by a man. It was originally developed as part of a DARPA program, and its initial application is expected to be with the police department of Miami-Dade County, Florida
In 2008, the TU Delft University in the Netherlands developed the smallest ornithopter fitted with a camera, the Delfly Micro, the third version of the Delfly project that started in 2005. This version measures 10 centimeters and weighs 3 grams, slightly larger (and noisier) than the dragonfly on which it was modeled. The importance of the camera lies in remote control when the Delfly is out of sight. However, this version has not yet been successfully tested outside, although it performs well indoors. Researcher David Lentink of Wageningen University, who participated in the development of previous models, DelFly I and DelFly II, says it will take at least half a century to mimic the capabilities of insects, with their low energy consumption and multitude of sensors—not only eyes, but gyroscopes, wind sensors, and much more. He says fly-size ornithopters should be possible, provided the tail is well designed. Rick Ruijsink of TU Delft cites battery weight as the biggest problem; the lithium-ion battery in the Delfly micro, at one gram, constitutes a third of the weight. Luckily, developments in this area are still going very fast, due to demand in various other commercial fields.
Ruijsink says the purpose of these craft is to understand insect flight and to provide practical uses, such as flying through cracks in concrete to search for earthquake victims or exploring radioactivity-contaminated buildings. Spy agencies and the military also see potential for such small vehicles as spies and scouts.
Robert Wood at Harvard University developed an even smaller ornithopter, at just 3 centimeters, but this craft is not autonomous in that it gets its power through a wire and is led along a rail.
In early 2008 the United States company Honeywell received FAA approval to operate its MAV, designated as gMAV in the national airspace on an experimental basis. The gMAV is the fourth MAV to receive such approval. The Honeywell gMAV uses ducted thrust for lift, allowing it to takeoff and land vertically and to hover. It is also capable of "high-speed" forward flight, according to the company, but no performance figures have been released. The company also states that the machine is light enough to be carried by a man. It was originally developed as part of a DARPA program, and its initial application is expected to be with the police department of Miami-Dade County, Florida
A micro air vehicle (MAV), or micro aerial vehicle, is a class of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) that has a size restriction and may be autonomous. Modern craft can be as small as 15 centimetres. Development is driven by commercial, research, government, and military purposes; with insect-sized aircraft reportedly expected in the future. The small craft allows remote observation of hazardous environments inaccessible to ground vehicles. MAVs have been built for hobby purposes, such as aerial robotics contests and aerial photography.
Friday, 7 December 2012
frequencies and sub channels
Frequency
Frequency determines the line of communication between a receiver and transmitter. The transmitter and receiver must both be on the same frequency so the plane can be controlled.Reserved frequencies
Many countries reserve specific frequency bands (ranges) for radio control use. Due to the longer range and potentially worse consequences of radio interference, model aircraft have exclusive use of their own frequency allocation in some countries.USA and Canada reserved frequency bands
- 72 MHz: aircraft only (France also uses US/Canada channels 21 through 35).
- 75 MHz: surface vehicles.
- 53 MHz: all vehicles, only for older equipment on 100 kHz spacing, with the operator holding a valid amateur radio (FCC in the USA) license. The 53 MHz band began to become vulnerable to amateur radio repeater stations operating on the 53 MHz area of the 6-meter band during the early 1980s. The 53 MHz bands can still be used with relative safety for ground-based (cars, boats/ships) powered modeling activities.
- 50.8 to 51 MHz: on the 6-meter band for all vehicles at 20 kHz spacing, with the operator holding a valid amateur radio (FCC in the USA) license. Added in the 1980s as the amateur radio repeater interference problem on the earlier 53 MHz bands in the United States began to manifest itself.
- 27 MHz: general use, toys.
- 2.400-2.485 GHz: Spread Spectrum band for general use (amateur radio license holders have 2.39-2.45 GHz licensed for their general use in the USA) and using both frequency-hopping spread spectrum and direct-sequence spread spectrum RF technology to maximize the number of available frequencies on this band, especially at organized events in North America.
European reserved frequency bands
- 35 MHz: aircraft only.
- 40 MHz: surface vehicles or aircraft.
- 27 MHz: general use, toys, citizens band radio.
- 2.4 GHz spread spectrum: surface vehicles, boats and aircraft.
Singapore reserved frequency bands
- 29 MHz: aircraft only
- 36 MHz: aircraft and water-craft (odd channels for aircraft only)
- 29 MHz: general use
- 27 MHz: light electric aircraft, general use
- 2.400-2.485 GHz: Spread Spectrum band for general use
- 35 MHz: aircraft only
- 40 MHz: aircraft only
- 27 MHz: general use
- 29 MHz: general use
- 36 MHz: general use
- 72 MHz: general use (US 72 MHz "even-numbered" channels 12 through 56, at 40 kHz spacing)
- 2.400-2.4835 GHz: general use
Detailed information, including cautions for transmitting on some of the 'general use' frequencies, can be found on the NZMAA website.
Amateur radio license reserved frequency bands
- 50 and 53 MHz in the USA and Canada
- 433–434 MHz in Germany (some of these German "ham RC" UHF band channels are also usable by "hams" in Switzerland)
Channels
Traditionally most RC aircraft in the USA utilized a 72 MHz frequency band for communication. The transmitter radio broadcasts using AM or FM using PPM or PCM. Each aircraft needs a way to determine which transmitter to receive communications from, so a specific channel within the frequency band is used for each aircraft (except for 2.4 GHz systems which use spread spectrum modulation, described below).Most systems use crystals to set the operating channel in the receiver and transmitter. It is important that each aircraft uses a different channel, otherwise interference could result. For example, if a person is flying an aircraft on channel 35, and someone else turns their radio on the same channel, the aircraft's control will be compromised and the result is almost always a crash. For this reason, when flying at RC airfields, there is normally a board where hobbyists can post their channel flag (or "frequency pin", based on a spring-loaded clothespin with the channel marked upon it) so everyone knows what channel they are using, avoiding such incidents.
A modern computer radio transmitter and receiver can be equipped with synthesizer technology, using a phase-locked loop (PLL), with the advantage of giving the pilot the opportunity to select any of the available channels with no need of changing a crystal. This is very popular in flying clubs where a lot of pilots have to share a limited number of channels. Latest receivers now available use synthesiser technology and are 'locked' to the transmitter being used. Double conversion radio reception is normal and can offer the advantage of a built-in 'failsafe' mode too. Using sythesised receivers saves on crystal costs and enables full use of the bandwidth available, for example the 35 MHz band.
Newer Transmitters use spread spectrum technology in the 2.4 GHz frequency for communication. Spread spectrum technology allows many pilots to transmit in the same band (2.4 GHz) in close proximity to each other with little fear of conflicts. Receivers in this band are virtually immune to most sources of electrical interference. Amateur radio licensees in the United States also have general use of an overlapping band in this same area, which exists from 2.39 to 2.45 GHz
challenge
Airborne Delivery Challenge
This challenge is open to Australian high school students. The objective is to create a future generation of aerospace professionals with a focus on UAVs.
An airframe has to be built and the mission is executed by two persons who will not communicate during the mission and will have technological targeting solutions in place:
In 2009 and 2010 a Robot Airborne Delivery Challenge was also held in parallel to the main Airborne Delivery Challenge. The Robot competition was dropped in 2011 in favor of bonus points for autonomous payload dropping in the Airborne Delivery Challenge.
It was reported, just prior to the 2011 event, that the UAV Challenge had inspired nineteen year old Chelsea Redman to become an aerospace engineer
This challenge is open to Australian high school students. The objective is to create a future generation of aerospace professionals with a focus on UAVs.
An airframe has to be built and the mission is executed by two persons who will not communicate during the mission and will have technological targeting solutions in place:
- UAV Controller in charge of piloting the airframe (or programming the mission in case of the Robotic challenge)
- Mission manager in charge of the mission package drop
In 2009 and 2010 a Robot Airborne Delivery Challenge was also held in parallel to the main Airborne Delivery Challenge. The Robot competition was dropped in 2011 in favor of bonus points for autonomous payload dropping in the Airborne Delivery Challenge.
It was reported, just prior to the 2011 event, that the UAV Challenge had inspired nineteen year old Chelsea Redman to become an aerospace engineer
Search and Rescue Challenge
The Search and Rescue Challenge is open for worldwide participation by universities and hobbyists.
'Outback Joe' is lost in the Australian outback and in need of assistance. Teams must develop a platform to accurately pinpoint the simulated target and accurately deliver an emergency package via an airdrop. The mission area is nearly 2 km from the airport and is approximately 4 km x 6 km. Teams must not fly greater than 1500 ft above ground level (AGL).
The overall mission requirements are targeted towards safety, excellence of the platform and innovation. There are a number of milestones leading up to the challenge dates.
The Search and Rescue Challenge is open for worldwide participation by universities and hobbyists.
'Outback Joe' is lost in the Australian outback and in need of assistance. Teams must develop a platform to accurately pinpoint the simulated target and accurately deliver an emergency package via an airdrop. The mission area is nearly 2 km from the airport and is approximately 4 km x 6 km. Teams must not fly greater than 1500 ft above ground level (AGL).
The overall mission requirements are targeted towards safety, excellence of the platform and innovation. There are a number of milestones leading up to the challenge dates.
$50,000 on offer who going to win
The UAV Challenge - Outback Rescue, often referred to as simply the UAV Outback Challenge or UAV Challenge, began in 2007 and has been held every year since. The event is aimed at promoting the civilian use of unmanned aerial vehicles and the development of low-cost systems that could be used for search and rescue missions. The events have been cooperative efforts between a number of organisations with interests in furthering the use of unmanned aircraft in civilian applications. The Australian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation (a partnership between CSIRO and Queensland University of Technology) has been a member of all six organising committees (2007 to 2012). The Queensland State Government was a co-organiser from 2007 to 2011 and a supporter in 2012. From 2007 to 2009 the event was also co-organised with Boeing Defence Australia. From 2011 to 2012 the event was co-organised by AUVS-Australia. There is a thorough scoring system with a clear emphasis on safety, capability and technical excellence. The format of the Challenge changed in 2011 with the Search and Rescue Challenge moving to a two-year long event.
The event is one of the largest robotics challenges in the world and one of the highest stakes UAV challenges, with $50,000 on offer to the winner of the Search and Rescue segment of the Challenge. The Search and Rescue Challenge takes place in Kingaroy, Queensland, Australia at the airport
The event is one of the largest robotics challenges in the world and one of the highest stakes UAV challenges, with $50,000 on offer to the winner of the Search and Rescue segment of the Challenge. The Search and Rescue Challenge takes place in Kingaroy, Queensland, Australia at the airport
Future
Future of a quad-copter is quite vast
based on various application fields it can be applied to. Quad-copter can be
used for conducting rescue operations where it’s humanly impossible to reach.
In terms of its military applications it can be more widely used for
surveillance purposes, without risking a human life. As more automated
quad-copters are being developed, there range of applications increases and
hence we can ensure there commercialization. Thus quad-copter can be used in
day to day working of a human life, ensuring their well-being.
With further study and advancement in
technology, designers are quite sure that a quad-copter can be used for
construction of huge towers and buildings. The main advantage in the future use
of a quad-copter for various purposes is that risk to human life, may it be
because of war or due to commercial accidents can be greatly avoided. The
future of quad-copter sure is bright and not far ahead.
Thursday, 6 December 2012
brushless motors
Brushless motors are a popular motor choice for model aircraft including helicopters. Their favorable power-to-weight ratios and large range of available sizes, from under 5 gram to large motors rated at thousands of watts, have revolutionized the market for electric-powered model flight, displacing virtually all brushed electric motors. They have also encouraged a growth of simple, lightweight electric model aircraft, rather than the previous internal combustion engines powering larger and heavier models. The large power-to-weight ratio of modern batteries and brush less motors allows models to ascend vertically, rather than climb gradually. The low noise and lack of mess compared to small glow fuel internal combustion engines that are used is another reason for their popularity.
Legal restrictions for the use of combustion engine driven model aircraft in some countries have also supported the shift to high-power electric systems.
Legal restrictions for the use of combustion engine driven model aircraft in some countries have also supported the shift to high-power electric systems.
History
- Oehmichen No.2, 1920
Etienne Oehmichen experimented with rotorcraft designs in the 1920s. Among the six designs he tried, his helicopter No.2 had four rotors and eight propellers, all driven by a single engine. The Oehmichen No.2 used a steel-tube frame, with two-bladed rotors at the ends of the four arms. The angle of these blades could be varied by warping. Five of the propellers, spinning in the horizontal plane, stabilized the machine laterally. Another propeller was mounted at the nose for steering. The remaining pair of propellers were for forward propulsion. The aircraft exhibited a considerable degree of stability and controllability for its time, and made more than a thousand test flights during the middle 1920s. By 1923 it was able to remain airborne for several minutes at a time, and on April 14, 1924 it established the first-ever FAI distance record for helicopters of 360 m (390 yd). Later, it completed the first 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) closed-circuit flight by a rotorcraft.[9]
- de Bothezat quadrator, 1922
Dr. George de Bothezat and Ivan Jerome developed this aircraft, with six bladed rotors at the end of an X-shaped structure. Two small propellers with variable pitch were used for thrust and yaw control. The vehicle used collective pitch control. It made its first flight in October 1922. About 100 flights were made by the end of 1923. The highest it ever reached was about 5 m (16 ft 5 in). Although demonstrating feasibility, it was, underpowered, unresponsive, mechanically complex and susceptible to reliability problems. Pilot workload was too high during hover to attempt lateral motion.[10]
- Convertawings Model A Quadrotor, 1956[11]
- This unique helicopter was intended to be the prototype for a line of much larger civil and military quadrotor helicopters. The design featured two engines driving four rotors with wings added for additional lift in forward flight. No tailrotor was needed and control was obtained by varying the thrust between rotors. Flown successfully many times in the mid 1950s, this helicopter proved the quadrotor design and it was also the first four-rotor helicopter to demonstrate successful forward flight. Due to a lack of orders for commercial or military versions however, the project was terminated.
- Convertawings proposed a Model E that would have a maximum weight of 42,000 lb (19,000 kg) with a payload of 10,900 lb (4,900 kg).
- Curtiss-Wright VZ-7, 1958
- The Curtiss-Wright VZ-7 was a VTOL aircraft designed by the Curtiss-Wright company for the US Army. The VZ-7 was controlled by changing the thrust of each of the four propellers
Most multirotors with a modest payload will find 15 minutes to be an achievable target with the right size battery. Longer flights become exponentially harder for a given payload. In theory large, slow rotors are inferior for control, but superior for efficiency. The size of a helicopter's rotor makes it potentially a lot more efficient, but the fact that it has to be variable pitch cuts it back down.
Competitive endurance runs tend to be in the 45-90 minute range
Competitive endurance runs tend to be in the 45-90 minute range
Electromechanical designs
A much more broad field, with a variety of mechanisms of action. These designs are often built as experiments at the amateur hobbyist level, but with the exception of the tricopter have not yet attained the popularity of the pure electronic designs.[8]
A much more broad field, with a variety of mechanisms of action. These designs are often built as experiments at the amateur hobbyist level, but with the exception of the tricopter have not yet attained the popularity of the pure electronic designs.[8]
Variable pitch
These models utilize the same type of variable pitch rotor and swashplate as a helicopter, but (usually) use it by applying cyclic differentially to non-coaxial propellers. This allows both very agile control, as demonstrated by MIT's ACL, and the potential to replace individual electric motors with belt-driven props hooked to a central internal combustion engine. Variable pitch is a rare option present in a few custom builds.Servo thrust vectoring
These models, such as the bicopter, the tricopter, and some VTOL gliding craft like the IAI Panther, utilize both differential thrust as well as at least one motor which is mounted on a servo, free to change its orientation. The tricopter, and to a lesser degree the bicopter, are extremely popular alternatives to electronic multirotors which operate on pure throttle control.Flap thrust vectoring
Wherever it is possible to rotate a motor/prop, it is also possible to redirect its flow using control vanes in the propeller downwash. Not a common solution on commercial models, but present in a few custom builds.
Common configurations
Electronic multirotors come in a number of different configurations: [7]
[edit] Electronically controlled
These use a central lithium polymer battery and 'flight controller' or stabilization board (containing an IMU, mounted in a core/hub section), and brushless motors & propellers mounted on nacelles extending outwards. The props are fixed-pitch, and the motors are mounted rigidly to the structure - all control is done in software throttling the motors differentially, necessitating a very rapid feedback loop.Electronic multirotors come in a number of different configurations: [7]
- X4 / 'Quad' - A typical quadrotor, quadrocopter, quadcopter, or just quad, with all props mounted on the ends of arms arrayed radially outward from a central hub, pulling upwards at opposite ends of the craft; May be switched between 'X' or 't' configuration (with one arm leading 'forward') in software
- Y4 - Arrayed like a tricopter without the servo, this uses two normal props in front on separate arms, and two coaxial ones in the rear mounted to one arm.
- H4 / H-Quad - A quad with a long, flat wood bar for a chassis, and the props mounted on two cross members bolted to the ends. Tends to fly in 'I' configuration for ease of camera mounting.
- V4 / V-Tail Quad - a quadrotor with the front props on normal long booms, and the rear props located in close proximity, tilted at an angle from vertical. This should give lower efficiency & flight times, but better orientation visibility and potentially better stability.
- 'Hexa'- A typical hexacopter, or just hexa, with six arms arrayed radially outward from a center point
- Y6 - A type of hexacopter that can be made more compact for the amount of lift, but is less efficient, with three arms arrayed radially outward from a center point, and one motor mounted at the end of each arm pointing up, and one pointing down
- 'Octo' - A typical octocopter, or just octo, that follows the pattern of one motor per arm arrayed radially. Common on 'heavy lift' designs that re-use parts from smaller part inventories. May have independent radial arms or a branching structure
- X8 - An octocopter that uses four arms, with motors arranged coaxially pointed up and down
- H8 - An octocopter that uses two parallel rails, each containing four rotors, attached to the core at multiple points. Generalizable (less commonly) to H6, H10, or H12 designs
- Asymmetric designs - Any of these can be stretched and skewed, possibly with the central core offset, to create a design that offers clearance in the front of the craft for a forward-looking camera un-obstructed by propellers. The center of gravity on these designs must be carefully managed to remain maneuverable
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
Saturday, 17 November 2012
Check out tutorials on YouTube
Links for the tutorials provided on YouTube to build your very own quadcopter.
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DHoLYf5pMA
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xZyJGYmRxw
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qf72c4i0WM
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZGw1ibYFR4
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aLX81YYQ6o
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRNbBiLSDX4
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm8ny1sbxGU
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUogtrZlH70
Hope this helps. ENJOY!!!!
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DHoLYf5pMA
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xZyJGYmRxw
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qf72c4i0WM
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZGw1ibYFR4
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aLX81YYQ6o
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRNbBiLSDX4
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm8ny1sbxGU
Basic Quadcopter Tutorial 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUogtrZlH70
Hope this helps. ENJOY!!!!
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
Join our Group @ Facebook
You can join our group "All about QuadCopters" @ facebook.com. A platform where you can put up your questions and provide inputs at the same time. A place where you can share your new ideas with the entire group.
Link To Our Group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/185727248223491/
Link To Our Group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/185727248223491/
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
Friday, 14 September 2012
Sunday, 3 June 2012
At first everything felt completely bizzare .We had no clue how things would work and would we finally give up on the project.It seemed completely impossible as if some one(our HOD) had asked us to pluck a tooth out of a crocodile's mouth.We had thought of going back to the HOD's office to request a change of project.
But there was somewhere a gut feeling why not just give it a try."I MEAN THERE IS NO HARM,WE HAVE QUITE SOME TIME IN HAND.LETS GO FOR IT!!!". Very truly said instincts are an untaught ability which tell us what to do before our head actually figures it out.So we just gave the whole thing a shot and the journey began.
Now the biggest question where to start from?And possibly there is only one answer GOOGLE!
Search "What is a Quad-copter".Go through the search results on the first page and the videos on YouTube, and end of the day it will seem as if you were asked to re build a SPUTNIK to land on moon.But all of it was very inspiring.
So keeping all that apart start from the basics,forget about the quad-copter.First started working on a Micro Controller from the basics.We choose the opensource ARDUINO platform.So lets start.
WHAT IS ARDUINO?
Arduino can be used to develop interactive objects, taking inputs from a variety of switches or sensors, and controlling a variety of lights, motors, and other physical outputs. Arduino projects can be stand-alone, or they can be communicate with software running on your computer (e.g. Flash, Processing, MaxMSP.) The boards can be assembled by hand or purchased preassembled; the open-source IDE can be downloaded for free.
Arduino hardware is programmed using a language very similar to C++ with some slight modifications and an IDE(Integrated Development Environment) based on Processing.Being very similar to C++ it becomes a lot easier to code than in assembly language.
Sunday, 27 May 2012
The first step
Now when we GOT the project (ya i know i emphasized on got, because we were forced to take this project as you all know and not allowed to choose a project) the first thing that came to our mind was how should we proceed with the project, as we were IT(information technology) students and had no knowledge about electronics or mechanics, required for building a quad-copter. Then we came across a group named 'tenet technetronics', who actually build projects for students for a fee. Now they extensively worked on robotics project (for which our HOD was completely crazy about) and since our project was a robotics project, we approached them. Now one good thing about this group was that they involved us in the project entirely and taught us step by step the entire procedure. So basically they were our mentors and helpers, who not only guided us in the right direction but also helped us with the project entirely.
This was the first step that we took to actually make this project. Now i know what most of you would be thinking, that we got our project made from outside and indeed that was the case, since we had no choice and we were from an IT background. But the best part was we actually were completely involved in the project and did work really hard and used to go to tenet technetronic center every day, and we learned the entire thing about making a quad-copter step by step. They used to even let us work on the quad-copter like with the electronic stuff and the mechanical stuff. It was indeed fun and we did complete our project on time. Now what all we learned about making a quad-copter, i would share on this blog gradually in upcoming posts, along with my friend Devashish Jasani.
This was the first step that we took to actually make this project. Now i know what most of you would be thinking, that we got our project made from outside and indeed that was the case, since we had no choice and we were from an IT background. But the best part was we actually were completely involved in the project and did work really hard and used to go to tenet technetronic center every day, and we learned the entire thing about making a quad-copter step by step. They used to even let us work on the quad-copter like with the electronic stuff and the mechanical stuff. It was indeed fun and we did complete our project on time. Now what all we learned about making a quad-copter, i would share on this blog gradually in upcoming posts, along with my friend Devashish Jasani.
Saturday, 26 May 2012
Never Thought we would build a quad-copter
The best part we never actually decided to do this project, it was just forced upon us (my team) apparently by our HOD (head of department). And when we started with it we never thought we would actually be able to do it. But lot of people helped us along with the project and we were able to build a quad-copter. If by any chance you don't know what a quad-copter is, i will share a image to get you the idea of it.
Quad-copter |
Quad-Copters for beginners
Hi all,
"This blog is meant for enthusiast or beginners interested in building a quad-copter."
I made a Quad-Copter along with three of my friends as a final year project while i was pursuing my engineering. Personally we faced a lot of problems, like how to get started with the whole thing and then regarding the materials we have to use and so many other variables. So i started this blog to share my experience while i was making a quad-copter. And i will try my level best to help if anyone is interested in building a quad-copter.
I made a Quad-Copter along with three of my friends as a final year project while i was pursuing my engineering. Personally we faced a lot of problems, like how to get started with the whole thing and then regarding the materials we have to use and so many other variables. So i started this blog to share my experience while i was making a quad-copter. And i will try my level best to help if anyone is interested in building a quad-copter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)