Monday, 17 December 2012

FPV

my fpv gear is here and ready to put on and test

Wednesday, 12 December 2012

COMPANYS TO BUY YOUR GEAR

ManufacturerParent CompanySupport HotlineReplacement Parts ListsWarrantyReturn PolicyWebsite
E-flite RCsubsidiary of Horizon Hobbyyes [1]yes [2]1 year [3]no direct sales
Fly Zonesubsidiary of Hobbicoyes [4]yes [5]"guarantees products to be free from defects in material and workmanship at the date of purchase" [6]no direct sales
Hangar 9subsidiary of Horizon Hobbyyes [7]yes [8]unclear from websiteno direct sales
HobbyZonesubsidiary of Horizon Hobbyyes, with call-back [9]yes [10]"guarantees products to be free from defects in material and workmanship at the date of purchase" [11]30 days, minus shipping costs; electronics may not have seal broken [12]
ParkFlyers R/Cyes [13]yes [14]unknown9 days, minus 15% restocking fee and shipping costs [15]
Park HobbiesPrivately owned [16]yes, with call-back [17]yes"Parkhobbies.com guarantees our kits to be free from defects in material and workmanship at the time of purchase."[18]10 days from receipt of purchase[19]
Stevens AreoModelPrivately OwnedYes, telephone and emailYesYes [20]Yes [20]http://www.stevensaero.com/
Aero WorksPrivately OwnedYes, telephone and email[21] and forums [22]Not Found on WebsiteYes, 30 days.Yes, 15% Restocking Fee [23]http://aero-works.net
HobbicoPrivately (Employee) OwnedYes, telephone and email[24]YesYes, depends on sub-brand.Yes, within 30 days.http://www.hobbico.com

[edit] See also

D.I.Y

DIY Cruise Missile
Simpson garnered significant media attention in 2003  when he announced his intention to build a DIY cruise missile for US$5000 using only "off-the-shelf" technology, mostly purchased from eBay and other online stores. The purpose of the project was to prove the point he made in an article published on 20 May 2002 that a cruise missile can be built with off the shelf technology and knowledge available to the general public. Simpson states on his FAQ page that he is not developing a new technology or creating a new threat, but creating awareness of an existing threat with the hope that it will stimulate research into an effective defense.
The project was put on hold when Simpson was adjudged bankrupt after a prosecution by the New Zealand Inland Revenue Department. Simpson claimed that the prosecution was politically motivated, as it was the only legal strategy available to the government of New Zealand to stop his work. A documentary which aired in April 2004 explored the events surrounding his prosecution.Simpson resumed and completed construction of the prototype cruise missile. His website claims that the missile is in "safe hands" somewhere in New Zealand, in a location unknown to him. Simpson says that not knowing the missile's whereabouts is a legal strategy intended to prevent his prosecution while it is tested. Simpson also claims to be halfway finished with completing a second cruise missile which he intends to donate to a museum or educational institution.[13] He stated an intention to release a book about his experience with the development of the missile, the media interest in 2003, and the reaction of the United States and New Zealand Governments to his announcement

fpv (first-person view

Video piloting
First-person view (FPV) flight is a type of remote-control flying that has grown in popularity in recent years. It involves mounting a small video camera and television transmitter on an RC aircraft and flying by means of a live video down-link, commonly displayed on video goggles or a portable LCD screen. When flying FPV, the pilot sees from the aircraft's perspective, and does not even have to look at the model. As a result, FPV aircraft can be flown well beyond visual range, limited only by the range of the remote control and video transmitter. Video transmitters typically operate at a power level between 200 mW and 1500 mW. The most common frequencies used for video transmission are 900 MHz, 1.2 GHz, 2.4 GHz, and 5.8 GHz. Specialized long-range UHF control systems operating at 433 MHz (for amateur radio licensees only) or 869 MHZ are commonly used to achieve greater control range, while the use of directional, high-gain antennas increases video range. Sophisticated setups are capable of achieving a range of 20–30 miles or more.
A basic FPV system consists of a camera, video transmitter, video receiver, and a display. More advanced setups commonly add in specialized hardware, including on-screen displays with GPS navigation and flight data, stabilization systems, and autopilot devices with "return to home" capability—allowing the aircraft to fly back to its starting point on its own in the event of signal loss. On-board cameras can be equipped with a pan and tilt mount, which when coupled with video goggles and "head tracking" devices creates a truly immersive, first-person experience, as if the pilot was actually sitting in the cockpit of the RC aircraft.
Both helicopters and fixed-wing RC aircraft are used for FPV flight. The most commonly chosen airframes for FPV planes are larger models with sufficient payload space for the video equipment and large wings capable of supporting the extra weight. Pusher-propeller planes are preferred so that the propeller is not in view of the camera. "Flying wing" designs are also popular for FPV, as they provide the best combination of large wing surface area, speed, maneuverability, and gliding ability. FPV aircraft are frequently used for aerial photography and videography, and many videos of FPV flights can be found on popular video sites such as YouTube and Vimeo.
In the United States, the Academy of Model Aeronautics' own safety code forbids the pilot of the model from observing its flight solely with onboard video, requiring the modeler to strictly use their own natural vision, only augmented by corrective eyewear when prescribed, throughout the flight to observe and safely control the model

Monday, 10 December 2012

$50,000

Search and Rescue Challenge

This category is open to Australian and international university students and aerospace enthusiasts.

The Mission

Outback Joe is lost in the Australian outback and desperately needs assistance. You must develop a UAV that is capable of locating Outback Joe and delivering an emergency package to him.

Where’s Outback Joe?

Your system must be capable of searching an area of at least 2nm x 2nm, up to 5nm from the aerodrome. The target for your search will be a dummy positioned in a typical resting pose in a rural setting.

The GPS coordinates of the search area are provided in Search and rescue Challenge Rules. The air vehicle must not travel outside of the search area or transit lane, for its flight will be terminated if it does so. The search area will be not more that 5nm from the aerodrome.

Over a 60 minute period teams launch their aircraft, conduct their search and locate Outback Joe. Once he has been found a GPS coordinate representing Outback Joe's location must be provided to the judges.

Rescue Outback Joe!

If GPS location for Outback Joe provided to the judges by the team is within 100 metres of Joe’s location the team will be given approval to deliver the emergency package. The emergency package will contain 500ml of 'life saving' water. The package must be dropped as closely as possible to Outback Joe, without landing on him. The UAV will then return to the Kingaroy airport for recovery.

The minimum requirements for the air vehicle are as follows:

The air vehicle must not weigh more than 100 kg (rotary) or 150kg (fixed wing) in the competition configuration

Points will be awarded based on the mission performance including the accuracy of the emergency package delivery, and the team’s answers to questions from the judges prior to the mission.

Additional Deliverables

Entrants will be required to submit a technical report before the close of registration. Later a more detailed technical report which outlines their design, methodology for package deployment and operational and safety procedures along with a flight demonstration video must be submitted and will contribute to the team’s score. Finally an Autonomous Flight Record that documents a minimum of five hours of autonomous flight must be provided.

Rules

Before entering, make sure you have read the UAV Challenge - Outback Rescue Competition Rules (V. 1.4, PDF, 5.44 MB) for the Search and Rescue Challenge.

Deliverable 2 Compliance Statement

UAVChallengeComplianceStatement2012-1.pdf

Waypoint Files

Search & Rescue Challenge Layout
2010OpenS&RLayout.kmz

Search & Rescue Scrutineering
2010S&RScrintineeringCourse.kmz

The prize

Winners in this category will receive AU$50,000*

The Schedule

For full schedule details please refer to the Search and Rescue Challenge 2011/12 rules. The key dates are:


Registration

closes on 27 July 2011 at 5pm AEST

Deliverable 1: Flight Safety Review

At the latest: 27 July 2011 at 5pm AEST

Deliverable 2: Flight Readiness Review

At the latest: 18 April 2012 at 5pm AEST

Deliverable 3: Autonomous Flight Record

At the latest: 15 Aug 2012 at 5pm AEST

Final “Go/No-Go” Announcement of Teams

22 Aug 2012

Search and Rescue Challenge

1 – 4 Oct 2012


Location

The Search and Rescue Challenge 2011/12 will be held in Kingaroy in October 2012

hope this helps you


Design Process


Design Process
The design process for the quadcopter is best described by first explaining the mechanical design and then following up with the electrical design. The following subsections will describe in detail the steps taken to design the quadcopter.

Mechanical Design
The unique nature of a flying machine requires a frame design that is both strong and lightweight. However, most materials that exhibit both of these characteristics are expensive, and also difficult to process. Therefore, aluminum was selected as the primary frame material due to its ready availability, relatively low cost, and reasonable strength to weight properties. Any components that were not major structural members were designed to be plastic, which is generally more expensive but lighter.
The original frame design involved mounting all four engines near the center of the flying machine, and extending driveshafts out to the four rotors. This design had the disadvantage of being very heavy (close to 15 lbs), and the drivetrain design was complex and difficult to build. The basic quadcopter design requires two of the four rotors to spin in the opposite direction as the other two. In the first generation frame design, this was accomplished through gearing, adding to the complexity of the design. The main reason for mounting the engines near the center was a perceived increase in stability due to most of the mass of the machine being located near the center of mass, decreasing the potential moment on the machine.



Electrical Design
A complex electrical system had to be designed in order to gather and process information in order to control the quadcopter. A top-level block diagram containing all of the major components of the electrical system is shown in Figure. 



The main part of the entire electrical system is the Controller board (which in our case was the Ardu-IMU V2 board). Controller board accepts input from various other electrical devices (Sensors) which it processes and provides output to the motors, for controlling the quadcopter.

Sunday, 9 December 2012

inside tricopter

kk 2.0 control board with 3x 28 size motors short shaft and a 11.1 3000mah battery

tricopter built


UFO MINI QUAD


australian N.S.W flying clubs


Archville Eagles
Website: n/a
Location: Yellow Rock Road, Urunga.
Contact: Paul Hinton .0266582878 / pauljudy[at]dodo[dot]com[dot]au.
Bathurst Model Aero Sports
Website: www.bathurstmodelaerosports.com.au
Location: Bathurst.
Bega District Model Club
Website: n/a
Location: Princes Highway, Frogs Hollow, South Bega.
Contact: Gary Hooper - turabeach[at]iprimus[dot]com[dot]au.
Central Coast Model Aero Club
Website: www.centralcoastmodelaeroclub.com
Location: Mannering Park, north of Sydney - see website for map.
Forster Great Lakes Model Aero Club
Website: www.fglmac.org
Location: Situated eight minutes south of Forster on the Lakes Way.
Gosford City Aeromodellers Club
Website: www.gcac.org.au
Location: Mangrove Rd, Narara.
Lake Macqaurie Miniature Aircraft Club (LMMAC)
Website: www.lmmac.net
Location: Griffen Road, Teralba, Lake Macqaurie.
Mathoura Radio Control Model Aircraft Club
Website: n/a
Location: Tantanane Rd Mathoura.
Contact: Douglas Henwood - 0457805068 / doughenwood @ bigpond . com
Milton/Ulladulla Model Aircraft Club
Website: n/a
Location: Ulladulla Sports Park (Follow the signs to the Sports Park and Skate Park), Ulladulla
Contact: Richard Knox (Club President) on 02 4457 3120 / rpknox[at]bigpond[dot]com.
New South Wales Scale Aircraft Society
Website: n/a
Location: Sydney, NSW
Contact: 02-97346288.
Northern Beaches Soaring Club
Website: n/a
Location: Various, on the Northern Beaches.
Contact: Patrick McGrath: mcgrathpatrick[at]hotmail[dot]com/(02) 9979 5638.
Parramatta Radio Control Aircraft Club
Website: www.rcflyingclub.com
Location: Reynolds Park off Tucks Rd & Powers Rd, Toongabbie.
Orange Model Aircraft Club Inc.
Website: n/a
Location: 16 Klms west of Orange on The Escort Way towards Parkes & Forbes
Contact: E-mail Norman Barnes at norbar[at]bigpond[dot]com.
Penrith Glenmore Park RC Flying Club
Website: n/a
Location: Glenmore Park 2745, Sydney West
Contact: Nasir Subhan: 0411134022 / subhan.nasir[at]gmail[dot]com.
Rebel Flying Club
Website: www.rebelflyingclub.com/
Location: Hexham, Newcastle.
Sunset Soaring Club, Inc.
Website: www.sunsetsoaring.org
Location: Golden Jubilee Back Oval, Esk St. Wahroonga.
Sutherland Shire Sport Flying Association Inc.
Website: n/a
Location: 300m south of the turnoff to WQoronora Dam on Old Princes Highway, Sydney.
Contact: Bryan.
The New South Wales Scale Aircraft Society Inc.
Website: www.nswsas.com.au
Location: We do not have a flying field of our own, but instead utilise other club fields promoting Scale Aircraft modelling through our Club Scale competitions. Sydney.
Warringah Radio Control Society
Website: www.wrcs.org.au/
Location: Belrose on Sydney's North Shore

Saturday, 8 December 2012

Block Diagram

FPV - speed racer


FPV - revo racing CHECK OUT JUZ 70 ON UTUBE


aerosim as multirotors on it for pc


another site to look at

http://www.drotek.fr/shop/en/23-multirotors

common abbreviations

 
AbbreviationInterpretation
ACCAccelerometer
ACCUGerman (among other languages) for rechargeable Battery
APPAnderson Power Poles
ARMAdvanced RISC Machine, now the proper name for ARM Ltd.
ATVAdjustable Travel Volume
BEC or BESCBattery Eliminator Circuit
BOMBill Of Materials
CCCopterControl
CC3DCopter Control 3D
CG or COGCenter Of Gravity
CPUCentral Processing Unit (ST ARM SOCs on OP boards)
CRCCyclic redundancy check
ESCElectronic Speed Controller
EPAEnd Point Adjustment
FCFlight Controller
FPVFirst Person View
GCSGround Control Station
GNDGround (mostly referring to the minus of the battery)
HKHobbyking
HPFHigh-pass Filter
I2CInter Integrated Circuit, (A communication bus)
IMUInertial Measurement Unit
INSInertial Navigation System
JST-SHA type of Connectors
JTAGJoint Test Action Group
KKKaptein Kuk (Multicopter controller by Rolf Bakke)
LiPoLithium-Polymer-Akkumulator (Battery)
LOSLine Of Sight, also can mean Loss Of Signal
LPFLow-pass Filter
MEMSMicro Electro Mechanical System
MKMikrokopter
MWCMultiWii Copter
NickGerman for fore/aft pitch or elevator
OPOpenPilot
OSDOn-screen Display
PCBPrinted Circuit Board
PCMPulse-code Modulation
PIDProportional-Integral-Derivative
PFDPrimary Flight Display
PPMPulse Position Modulation
PWMPulse Width Modulation
PWRPower (often referring to the plus of the battery)
RCRemote Controlled
RCGRCGroups
RXReceiver
SCCPSource Code Control Program (OP uses Git for this)
SCLSerial Clock Line (I2C bus)
SDASerial Data Line (I2C bus)
SOCSystem On a Chip
SVNA revision/version control system
SxServo
TXTransmitter
UARTUniversal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter
UAVUnmanned Aerial Vehicle
UAV-TalkAn open binary protocol
USARTUniversal Synchronous-Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter
VCPVirtual Communication Port
VTOLVertical Take Off & Landing
WMPWii Motion Plus
XT60A type of connector

ZEROUAV DISTRIBUTORS/RETAILERS

 

Below is a list of Distributors / Retailers who are selling the ZeroUAV YS-X6 around the world.
I am offering this service because I get many enquiries from around the world and sometimes it is not financially viable for me to sell to customers from other countries.
Australia – Multirotortech
France – Maxicopter
South Africa – Multirotor
Spain – RC Innovations
UK – Electriflite
USA – GotheliRC

check this site out

http://www.draganfly.com/uav-helicopter/draganflyer-x8/index.php

mad looking control


mirco air vehicle

In January 2010, the Tamkang University (TKU) in Taiwan realized autonomous control of the flight altitude of an 8-gram, 20-centimeter wide, flapping-wing MAV. The MEMS Lab in the TKU has been developing MAVs for several years, and since 2007 the Space and Flight Dynamics (SFD) Lab has joined the research team for the development of autonomous flight of MAVs. Instead of traditional sensors and computational devices, which are too heavy for most MAVs, the SFD combined a stereo-vision system with a ground station to control the flight altitude, making it the first flapping-wing MAV under 10 grams that realized autonomous flight.
In 2008, the TU Delft University in the Netherlands developed the smallest ornithopter fitted with a camera, the Delfly Micro, the third version of the Delfly project that started in 2005. This version measures 10 centimeters and weighs 3 grams, slightly larger (and noisier) than the dragonfly on which it was modeled. The importance of the camera lies in remote control when the Delfly is out of sight. However, this version has not yet been successfully tested outside, although it performs well indoors. Researcher David Lentink of Wageningen University, who participated in the development of previous models, DelFly I and DelFly II, says it will take at least half a century to mimic the capabilities of insects, with their low energy consumption and multitude of sensors—not only eyes, but gyroscopes, wind sensors, and much more. He says fly-size ornithopters should be possible, provided the tail is well designed. Rick Ruijsink of TU Delft cites battery weight as the biggest problem; the lithium-ion battery in the Delfly micro, at one gram, constitutes a third of the weight. Luckily, developments in this area are still going very fast, due to demand in various other commercial fields.
Ruijsink says the purpose of these craft is to understand insect flight and to provide practical uses, such as flying through cracks in concrete to search for earthquake victims or exploring radioactivity-contaminated buildings. Spy agencies and the military also see potential for such small vehicles as spies and scouts.
Robert Wood at Harvard University developed an even smaller ornithopter, at just 3 centimeters, but this craft is not autonomous in that it gets its power through a wire and is led along a rail.
In early 2008 the United States company Honeywell received FAA approval to operate its MAV, designated as gMAV in the national airspace on an experimental basis. The gMAV is the fourth MAV to receive such approval. The Honeywell gMAV uses ducted thrust for lift, allowing it to takeoff and land vertically and to hover. It is also capable of "high-speed" forward flight, according to the company, but no performance figures have been released. The company also states that the machine is light enough to be carried by a man. It was originally developed as part of a DARPA program, and its initial application is expected to be with the police department of Miami-Dade County, Florida
A micro air vehicle (MAV), or micro aerial vehicle, is a class of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) that has a size restriction and may be autonomous. Modern craft can be as small as 15 centimetres. Development is driven by commercial, research, government, and military purposes; with insect-sized aircraft reportedly expected in the future. The small craft allows remote observation of hazardous environments inaccessible to ground vehicles. MAVs have been built for hobby purposes, such as aerial robotics contests and aerial photography.

Friday, 7 December 2012

frequencies and sub channels


 Frequency

Frequency determines the line of communication between a receiver and transmitter. The transmitter and receiver must both be on the same frequency so the plane can be controlled.

 Reserved frequencies

Many countries reserve specific frequency bands (ranges) for radio control use. Due to the longer range and potentially worse consequences of radio interference, model aircraft have exclusive use of their own frequency allocation in some countries.
USA and Canada reserved frequency bands
  • 72 MHz: aircraft only (France also uses US/Canada channels 21 through 35).
  • 75 MHz: surface vehicles.
  • 53 MHz: all vehicles, only for older equipment on 100 kHz spacing, with the operator holding a valid amateur radio (FCC in the USA) license. The 53 MHz band began to become vulnerable to amateur radio repeater stations operating on the 53 MHz area of the 6-meter band during the early 1980s. The 53 MHz bands can still be used with relative safety for ground-based (cars, boats/ships) powered modeling activities.
  • 50.8 to 51 MHz: on the 6-meter band for all vehicles at 20 kHz spacing, with the operator holding a valid amateur radio (FCC in the USA) license. Added in the 1980s as the amateur radio repeater interference problem on the earlier 53 MHz bands in the United States began to manifest itself.
  • 27 MHz: general use, toys.
  • 2.400-2.485 GHz: Spread Spectrum band for general use (amateur radio license holders have 2.39-2.45 GHz licensed for their general use in the USA) and using both frequency-hopping spread spectrum and direct-sequence spread spectrum RF technology to maximize the number of available frequencies on this band, especially at organized events in North America.

European reserved frequency bands
  • 35 MHz: aircraft only.
  • 40 MHz: surface vehicles or aircraft.
  • 27 MHz: general use, toys, citizens band radio.
  • 2.4 GHz spread spectrum: surface vehicles, boats and aircraft.
Within the 35 MHz range, there are designated A and B bands. Some European countries allow use only in the A band, whereas others allow use in both bands.
Singapore reserved frequency bands
  • 29 MHz: aircraft only
Australian reserved frequency bands
  • 36 MHz: aircraft and water-craft (odd channels for aircraft only)
  • 29 MHz: general use
  • 27 MHz: light electric aircraft, general use
  • 2.400-2.485 GHz: Spread Spectrum band for general use
New Zealand reserved frequency bands
  • 35 MHz: aircraft only
  • 40 MHz: aircraft only
  • 27 MHz: general use
  • 29 MHz: general use
  • 36 MHz: general use
  • 72 MHz: general use (US 72 MHz "even-numbered" channels 12 through 56, at 40 kHz spacing)
  • 2.400-2.4835 GHz: general use
The frequencies are permitted under legislation, provided equipment meets the appropriate standards, bears the New Zealand supplier's Supplier Code Number and has the correct compliance documentation (Radio Spectrum Management information available on the RSM website)
Detailed information, including cautions for transmitting on some of the 'general use' frequencies, can be found on the NZMAA website.
Amateur radio license reserved frequency bands
  • 50 and 53 MHz in the USA and Canada
  • 433–434 MHz in Germany (some of these German "ham RC" UHF band channels are also usable by "hams" in Switzerland)

 Channels

Traditionally most RC aircraft in the USA utilized a 72 MHz frequency band for communication. The transmitter radio broadcasts using AM or FM using PPM or PCM. Each aircraft needs a way to determine which transmitter to receive communications from, so a specific channel within the frequency band is used for each aircraft (except for 2.4 GHz systems which use spread spectrum modulation, described below).
Most systems use crystals to set the operating channel in the receiver and transmitter. It is important that each aircraft uses a different channel, otherwise interference could result. For example, if a person is flying an aircraft on channel 35, and someone else turns their radio on the same channel, the aircraft's control will be compromised and the result is almost always a crash. For this reason, when flying at RC airfields, there is normally a board where hobbyists can post their channel flag (or "frequency pin", based on a spring-loaded clothespin with the channel marked upon it) so everyone knows what channel they are using, avoiding such incidents.
A modern computer radio transmitter and receiver can be equipped with synthesizer technology, using a phase-locked loop (PLL), with the advantage of giving the pilot the opportunity to select any of the available channels with no need of changing a crystal. This is very popular in flying clubs where a lot of pilots have to share a limited number of channels. Latest receivers now available use synthesiser technology and are 'locked' to the transmitter being used. Double conversion radio reception is normal and can offer the advantage of a built-in 'failsafe' mode too. Using sythesised receivers saves on crystal costs and enables full use of the bandwidth available, for example the 35 MHz band.
Newer Transmitters use spread spectrum technology in the 2.4 GHz frequency for communication. Spread spectrum technology allows many pilots to transmit in the same band (2.4 GHz) in close proximity to each other with little fear of conflicts. Receivers in this band are virtually immune to most sources of electrical interference. Amateur radio licensees in the United States also have general use of an overlapping band in this same area, which exists from 2.39 to 2.45 GHz

sign up for the challenge

http://www.uavoutbackchallenge.com.au/

challenge

Airborne Delivery Challenge
This challenge is open to Australian high school students. The objective is to create a future generation of aerospace professionals with a focus on UAVs.
An airframe has to be built and the mission is executed by two persons who will not communicate during the mission and will have technological targeting solutions in place:
  • UAV Controller in charge of piloting the airframe (or programming the mission in case of the Robotic challenge)
  • Mission manager in charge of the mission package drop
Other team members are permitted and many teams have roles for a team manager, media manager and safety manager.
In 2009 and 2010 a Robot Airborne Delivery Challenge was also held in parallel to the main Airborne Delivery Challenge. The Robot competition was dropped in 2011 in favor of bonus points for autonomous payload dropping in the Airborne Delivery Challenge.
It was reported, just prior to the 2011 event, that the UAV Challenge had inspired nineteen year old Chelsea Redman to become an aerospace engineer
Search and Rescue Challenge
The Search and Rescue Challenge is open for worldwide participation by universities and hobbyists.
'Outback Joe' is lost in the Australian outback and in need of assistance. Teams must develop a platform to accurately pinpoint the simulated target and accurately deliver an emergency package via an airdrop. The mission area is nearly 2 km from the airport and is approximately 4 km x 6 km. Teams must not fly greater than 1500 ft above ground level (AGL).
The overall mission requirements are targeted towards safety, excellence of the platform and innovation. There are a number of milestones leading up to the challenge dates.

$50,000 on offer who going to win

The UAV Challenge - Outback Rescue, often referred to as simply the UAV Outback Challenge or UAV Challenge, began in 2007 and has been held every year since. The event is aimed at promoting the civilian use of unmanned aerial vehicles and the development of low-cost systems that could be used for search and rescue missions. The events have been cooperative efforts between a number of organisations with interests in furthering the use of unmanned aircraft in civilian applications. The Australian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation (a partnership between CSIRO and Queensland University of Technology) has been a member of all six organising committees (2007 to 2012). The Queensland State Government was a co-organiser from 2007 to 2011 and a supporter in 2012. From 2007 to 2009 the event was also co-organised with Boeing Defence Australia. From 2011 to 2012 the event was co-organised by AUVS-Australia. There is a thorough scoring system with a clear emphasis on safety, capability and technical excellence. The format of the Challenge changed in 2011 with the Search and Rescue Challenge moving to a two-year long event.
The event is one of the largest robotics challenges in the world and one of the highest stakes UAV challenges, with $50,000 on offer to the winner of the Search and Rescue segment of the Challenge. The Search and Rescue Challenge takes place in Kingaroy, Queensland, Australia at the airport

Future


Future of a quad-copter is quite vast based on various application fields it can be applied to. Quad-copter can be used for conducting rescue operations where it’s humanly impossible to reach. In terms of its military applications it can be more widely used for surveillance purposes, without risking a human life. As more automated quad-copters are being developed, there range of applications increases and hence we can ensure there commercialization. Thus quad-copter can be used in day to day working of a human life, ensuring their well-being.
With further study and advancement in technology, designers are quite sure that a quad-copter can be used for construction of huge towers and buildings. The main advantage in the future use of a quad-copter for various purposes is that risk to human life, may it be because of war or due to commercial accidents can be greatly avoided. The future of quad-copter sure is bright and not far ahead.  

Thursday, 6 December 2012

brushless motors

Brushless motors are a popular motor choice for model aircraft including helicopters. Their favorable power-to-weight ratios and large range of available sizes, from under 5 gram to large motors rated at thousands of watts, have revolutionized the market for electric-powered model flight, displacing virtually all brushed electric motors. They have also encouraged a growth of simple, lightweight electric model aircraft, rather than the previous internal combustion engines powering larger and heavier models. The large power-to-weight ratio of modern batteries and brush less motors allows models to ascend vertically, rather than climb gradually. The low noise and lack of mess compared to small glow fuel internal combustion engines that are used is another reason for their popularity.
Legal restrictions for the use of combustion engine driven model aircraft in some countries have also supported the shift to high-power electric systems.

new ArduPilotMega 2.5

http://store.diydrones.com/APM_2_5_Assembled_p/br-apmpwrkt.htm

ardupilot




History
  • Oehmichen No.2, 1920
    Etienne Oehmichen experimented with rotorcraft designs in the 1920s. Among the six designs he tried, his helicopter No.2 had four rotors and eight propellers, all driven by a single engine. The Oehmichen No.2 used a steel-tube frame, with two-bladed rotors at the ends of the four arms. The angle of these blades could be varied by warping. Five of the propellers, spinning in the horizontal plane, stabilized the machine laterally. Another propeller was mounted at the nose for steering. The remaining pair of propellers were for forward propulsion. The aircraft exhibited a considerable degree of stability and controllability for its time, and made more than a thousand test flights during the middle 1920s. By 1923 it was able to remain airborne for several minutes at a time, and on April 14, 1924 it established the first-ever FAI distance record for helicopters of 360 m (390 yd). Later, it completed the first 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) closed-circuit flight by a rotorcraft.[9]
  • de Bothezat quadrator, 1922
    Dr. George de Bothezat and Ivan Jerome developed this aircraft, with six bladed rotors at the end of an X-shaped structure. Two small propellers with variable pitch were used for thrust and yaw control. The vehicle used collective pitch control. It made its first flight in October 1922. About 100 flights were made by the end of 1923. The highest it ever reached was about 5 m (16 ft 5 in). Although demonstrating feasibility, it was, underpowered, unresponsive, mechanically complex and susceptible to reliability problems. Pilot workload was too high during hover to attempt lateral motion.[10]
This unique helicopter was intended to be the prototype for a line of much larger civil and military quadrotor helicopters. The design featured two engines driving four rotors with wings added for additional lift in forward flight. No tailrotor was needed and control was obtained by varying the thrust between rotors. Flown successfully many times in the mid 1950s, this helicopter proved the quadrotor design and it was also the first four-rotor helicopter to demonstrate successful forward flight. Due to a lack of orders for commercial or military versions however, the project was terminated.
  • Convertawings proposed a Model E that would have a maximum weight of 42,000 lb (19,000 kg) with a payload of 10,900 lb (4,900 kg).
The Curtiss-Wright VZ-7 was a VTOL aircraft designed by the Curtiss-Wright company for the US Army. The VZ-7 was controlled by changing the thrust of each of the four propellers
Most multirotors with a modest payload will find 15 minutes to be an achievable target with the right size battery. Longer flights become exponentially harder for a given payload. In theory large, slow rotors are inferior for control, but superior for efficiency. The size of a helicopter's rotor makes it potentially a lot more efficient, but the fact that it has to be variable pitch cuts it back down.
Competitive endurance runs tend to be in the 45-90 minute range
Electromechanical designs
A much more broad field, with a variety of mechanisms of action. These designs are often built as experiments at the amateur hobbyist level, but with the exception of the tricopter have not yet attained the popularity of the pure electronic designs.[8]

 Variable pitch

These models utilize the same type of variable pitch rotor and swashplate as a helicopter, but (usually) use it by applying cyclic differentially to non-coaxial propellers. This allows both very agile control, as demonstrated by MIT's ACL, and the potential to replace individual electric motors with belt-driven props hooked to a central internal combustion engine. Variable pitch is a rare option present in a few custom builds.

 Servo thrust vectoring

These models, such as the bicopter, the tricopter, and some VTOL gliding craft like the IAI Panther, utilize both differential thrust as well as at least one motor which is mounted on a servo, free to change its orientation. The tricopter, and to a lesser degree the bicopter, are extremely popular alternatives to electronic multirotors which operate on pure throttle control.

 Flap thrust vectoring

Wherever it is possible to rotate a motor/prop, it is also possible to redirect its flow using control vanes in the propeller downwash. Not a common solution on commercial models, but present in a few custom builds.
Common configurations

[edit] Electronically controlled

These use a central lithium polymer battery and 'flight controller' or stabilization board (containing an IMU, mounted in a core/hub section), and brushless motors & propellers mounted on nacelles extending outwards. The props are fixed-pitch, and the motors are mounted rigidly to the structure - all control is done in software throttling the motors differentially, necessitating a very rapid feedback loop.
Electronic multirotors come in a number of different configurations: [7]
  • X4 / 'Quad' - A typical quadrotor, quadrocopter, quadcopter, or just quad, with all props mounted on the ends of arms arrayed radially outward from a central hub, pulling upwards at opposite ends of the craft; May be switched between 'X' or 't' configuration (with one arm leading 'forward') in software
  • Y4 - Arrayed like a tricopter without the servo, this uses two normal props in front on separate arms, and two coaxial ones in the rear mounted to one arm.
  • H4 / H-Quad - A quad with a long, flat wood bar for a chassis, and the props mounted on two cross members bolted to the ends. Tends to fly in 'I' configuration for ease of camera mounting.
  • V4 / V-Tail Quad - a quadrotor with the front props on normal long booms, and the rear props located in close proximity, tilted at an angle from vertical. This should give lower efficiency & flight times, but better orientation visibility and potentially better stability.
  • 'Hexa'- A typical hexacopter, or just hexa, with six arms arrayed radially outward from a center point
  • Y6 - A type of hexacopter that can be made more compact for the amount of lift, but is less efficient, with three arms arrayed radially outward from a center point, and one motor mounted at the end of each arm pointing up, and one pointing down
  • 'Octo' - A typical octocopter, or just octo, that follows the pattern of one motor per arm arrayed radially. Common on 'heavy lift' designs that re-use parts from smaller part inventories. May have independent radial arms or a branching structure
  • X8 - An octocopter that uses four arms, with motors arranged coaxially pointed up and down
  • H8 - An octocopter that uses two parallel rails, each containing four rotors, attached to the core at multiple points. Generalizable (less commonly) to H6, H10, or H12 designs
  • Asymmetric designs - Any of these can be stretched and skewed, possibly with the central core offset, to create a design that offers clearance in the front of the craft for a forward-looking camera un-obstructed by propellers. The center of gravity on these designs must be carefully managed to remain maneuverable

kk 2.0 control board works very good

 

my multirotor